the schema-accurate-but-security-incomplete framing is the real finding here -- "covered every table with the obvious column" and "covered every table that needs an ownership check" are different claims, and the gap between them is exactly the kind of thing that survives a first pass because nothing forces you to ask whether the owner is one hop up instead of on the row itself. curious whether phase 53 turns that into an automated check rather than a habit -- something that walks every mutation and asserts an ownership check actually fires, so the next audit doesn't have to rediscover the same category of gap by hand. on the confirmation gate: what's the plan if the single operator isn't just forgetful but genuinely unavailable for a while -- does the gate degrade into someone else needing access, or is that explicitly out of scope until it isn't a single-operator system anymore.