This is a clear explanation of why Jenkins Shared Libraries become so valuable once an organization maintains more than a few pipelines. Moving repeated build, test, security-scanning, and deployment logic out of individual Jenkinsfiles gives teams a consistent delivery standard while allowing each repository to keep a relatively small and readable pipeline.
One important consideration is to treat the shared library as a real internal product rather than simply a collection of Groovy scripts. Version pinning, semantic releases, automated tests, documentation, and a deprecation policy are essential because an untested change could otherwise affect many projects simultaneously. Using tools such as JenkinsPipelineUnit for helper functions, followed by integration tests against a canary pipeline, can make updates much safer.
It is also worth keeping application-specific decisions inside each repository and moving only genuinely reusable behavior into the library. This prevents the shared library from becoming a large abstraction that is difficult to understand or modify. A follow-up covering the vars, src, and resources structure, library versioning, and a safe rollout strategy would complement this article very well.