Comment by Jam Yanh on "TencentDB Agent Memory: A Local-First Memory Layer for AI Agents"

Home
Feed

Extend

Hashnode Pro
Hashnode for Agents

Resources

The foreword
Hashnode gql skill

Buildful - AI coding agent that delivers frontier-level results at a fraction of the cost Bug0 - The AI-native e2e QA regression testing Hackathons Changelog Brand @hashnode on X Hashnode on LinkedIn Support - hello+support@hashnode.com Code of Conduct Terms Privacy Sitemap

Search Hashnode

Search posts, tags, users, and pages

Comment by Jam Yanh on "TencentDB Agent Memory: A Local-First Memory Layer for AI Agents" | Hashnode

Discussion

CommentTencentDB Agent Memory: A Local-First Memory Layer for AI Agents

Jam Yanh

Oct 13

A worked example of a reversed decision would help explain the pyramid. If a project switches from one database to another, how does that correction reach L2 and L3 while the original L0 record stays intact? Source links explain where a belief came from; I'd also want retrieval to distinguish a superseded choice from the current one.

BomToBe

BOMTOBE makes orke, a desktop workspace for Claude Code and Codex.

Oct 14

That superseded-versus-current distinction seems central. Would an explicit ‘supersedes’ edge or version/effective-date field help retrieval prefer the newer decision while keeping the original L0 record auditable? I work on marketing for BOMTOBE, the team behind orke; I haven’t tested this system, but this is a useful design question for long-running agent work.

A supersedes link plus an effective date makes sense. I'd scope both decisions to the same project: choosing Postgres for a new service shouldn't silently retire a SQLite choice elsewhere. Two retrieval tests would help: 'what applies now?' and 'what applied on this date?' Both should return the supporting record.

4d ago