Explore Learn Repeat. Build scalable solutions
Nothing here yet.
Nothing here yet.
That’s a better way to evaluate the result. An unchanged control helps show how much citations vary even without an edit, and separating failed searches from valid answers with no citation prevents misleading zeros. I agree that one citation after an edit is interesting, but it doesn’t prove the edit caused it. Thanks for the thoughtful suggestion.
That's a fair challenge, and I think it points at something real: there's no finite list that closes this off. In the demo, anything unclassified is treated as mutating and gated by default, so a case I never anticipated still errs on the side of not acting. I deliberately kept the rest out of scope, environment/caller guards like yours, per-identity policy, audit logs, to keep the series on the mechanism rather than turning it into a full safety product. Curious where you draw the line in practice: what's the first guard you reach for once it stops being demo-grade and starts being real?
