Good read. Sometimes the biggest feature is just having a simpler mental model

This was a fun read. I like seeing the messy trial-and-error part instead of just the final result

This is exactly the kind of bug that looks harmless in a code review and then ruins someone's afternoon later

It's funny how the challenge keeps moving up the stack. First it's getting the data, then it's reconstructing state, then it's making sense of that state

AI is great until it confidently gives you something that almost works

Yeah, visibility is one of those things you only appreciate when something breaks. That's true for security and automation alike

Makes sense. A RAG system is only as trustworthy as the data and steps feeding into it.

Same reason I like automating repetitive stuff with Workbeaver. Once you've stopped doing the same thing over and over, it's hard to go back

Building the MVP is one thing, figuring out what people actually want is the real adventure, tnx for sharing this

Strong typing tells me what the system accepts, it doesn't tell me why the system exists or why a business rule was added. I still find that kind of documentation useful