Great question. The UNS itself is intentionally agnostic to who consumes the data. It provides a trusted, real-time operational data backbone where producers publish state and consumers subscribe to it. How write authority is managed is a separate architectural concern from the UNS itself. In practice, write operations are typically handled through governed command interfaces with appropriate authentication, authorisation, acknowledgements, and safety controls rather than treating the UNS as a general-purpose control bus. I'll be covering agent execution, write authority, and closed-loop control in a later post in this series, where we'll dive into how AI agents interact safely with industrial control systems without compromising deterministic operations.
@roniejoseph
About
I am a Senior Automation Manager and Aspiring Technical Fellow specializing in the intersection of legacy industrial manufacturing and next-generation AI architectures.
Throughout my career, I have navigated the complex realities of Tier-1 CapEx facility expansions, bridging the gap between high-speed physical automation (PLCs, SCADA, PackML) and modern digital infrastructure.
My current focus is on transforming traditional, deterministic factory floors into autonomous, closed-loop ecosystems. On this blog, I write deep-dive technical breakdowns on:
Agentic Orchestration: Deploying autonomous AI agents to manage factory exceptions and maintenance loops.
Unified Namespace (UNS) & MQTT: Breaking down legacy point-to-point data silos.
Loop Engineering & RAG: Implementing Retrieval-Augmented Generation at the edge to solve supply chain and flexibility bottlenecks in hyperscale manufacturing.
I believe the future of industrial automation isn't just about faster machines—it is about deploying intelligent software architectures (like the Model Context Protocol) that can reason, decide, and act in real-time.
Always open to discussing Agentic AI, UNS architectures, and the realities of modern manufacturing.
Available for
Nothing here yet.