Hello @emilmoe,

Choosing between vector and raster graphics is a matter of what you are working on. I've simplified my opinion below and I hope this helps.

---

Summary:

If you're working on wireframes and documents with shapes, lines, and colors then vector trumps raster. However, if you're working on documents dominated by photography or illustrations, then working with raster graphics is a better approach.

---

Vectors graphics are created with mathematical curves and paths while raster graphics (or bitmaps) are composed of pixels. Below is a diagram to show the difference between the two:

The benefits of vectors include:

• Scalability: Vectors can be scaled to any size while retaining quality
• File-size efficiency: Vectors are usually smaller in size and can easily be shared with others
• Editing capabilities: Vectors are made up of anchor points and can easily be modified in the future
• Print quality: Vector graphics usually look better when printer as compared to raster graphics

One of the only disadvantage of vector graphics is compatibility. Not all applications support vector formats such as .SVG and .EPS. However, most applications which do support vectors, allow you to export them as rasters.

---

Conclusion:

Vectors graphics are easily a better option. Try and use them in as many places where it's appropriate, and you'll slowly learn of the many advantages along the way.

I prefer the precision of vectors. They also have a great ability to scale regardless of dimensions or pixel density. That said, many clients will only let me provide raster based deliverables.

Vector! You can always convert/export your vector to a raster image. Can't go the other way