Looks like most apps are using s3 to load images - my slack images weren't working for instance.
What do you think went wrong with Amazon S3 this Tuesday?
At the scale of AWS or any of the major cloud service provider, the slightest misconfig of a router, switch, etc... can tear down entire networks. We are only human, after all...
-- Edit --
Officially, official
Sébastien Portebois
Software architect at Ubisoft
As far as I know, no details have been disclosed yet, and I doubt we'll learn much more (but I'd be happy to be proven wrong).
AWS failures happen from time to time. What was really "interesting", and unusual (historic?) in this case, is that the S3 outage affected all the availability zones in the us-east-1 region.
Here's a quick reminder of the physical hierarchy:
Some services are bound to an AZ, some are region wide, and some are worldwide (usually worldwide means everywhere excluding GOV and China).
The curious and unusual event of Tuesday was that the outage impacted a whole region at once (and us-east-1 is one of the main ones, and has 5 availability zones).
I really suspect some major failures at the S3 API level, which indeed runs at the region level. In such a case, the common best-practice to deploy on multiple availability-zone to be resilient became useless, because the issue happened at a higher level, impacting all the AZs of the region at once (which should never happen, by design)
Only high-level API outages like this could have similar (catastrophic) consequences, like an IAM outage which would make any privileges broken, forbidding any access from anywhere. (I never heard of such an outage, but it would be a catastrophic one)