Discussion on "Fiber (Go) vs. Nickel.rs (Rust): A Performance Showdown in 'Hello World'" | Hashnode

Discussion

Engin Diri

Customer Experience Architect @ Pulumi

Apr 8, 2023

Fiber (Go) vs. Nickel.rs (Rust): A Performance Showdown in 'Hello World'

Introduction In this article, I want to compare the performance of two different web frameworks for Rust and Go. Both frameworks are very similar in their design (all are inspired by Express.js) and both claim to be the fastest web framework (blazing...

blog.ediri.io4 min read

#rust #golang #developer #development #performance

Responses(2)

Hoh Shen Yien

I write codes and blogs 🍵

Apr 11, 2023

Interesting benchmark! Just wondering if you have any context for why the max response time for Nickel.rs can go up to 30s?

I can only explain it, that my web server can't handle all the requests/s and timeout. I see some timeouts in the result of bombardier:

Bombarding 127.0.0.1 with 5000000 request(s) using 50 connection(s)
 5000000 / 5000000 [==================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================] 100.00% 106194/s 47s
Done!
Statistics        Avg      Stdev        Max
  Reqs/sec    106292.69   44491.73  224577.53
  Latency      393.78us    91.33ms     33.91s
  Latency Distribution
     50%    43.00us
     75%    63.00us
     90%   103.00us
     95%   170.00us
     99%   642.00us
  HTTP codes:
    1xx - 0, 2xx - 4999962, 3xx - 0, 4xx - 0, 5xx - 0
    others - 38
  Errors:
    dial tcp 127.0.0.1:6767: connect: operation timed out - 38
  Throughput:    21.90MB/s

Search Hashnode

Fiber (Go) vs. Nickel.rs (Rust): A Performance Showdown in 'Hello World'

Responses(2)

Recent in Forum