Like all good/bad questions, this is more about your personal values and preferences, than about technology.

If you like being outside, working with your hands, living a fairly simple/monotonous life, traditional culture, and you aren't particularly opposed to superstition and dying young, then technology was probably bad for you.

If you like safety and longevity, having most of the information in the world available in 30 seconds, being able to visit or contact people all over the world, if you like luxuries and entertainment, then technology was great!

You can probably guess which one I like more.

Anyway, you don't have too much of a choice. You can choose not to parttake in a few technologies, but unless you're retired you can't just tune the whole thing out.

I would go for the approach that technology enables you to do more good as well as more harm.

etymonline.com/word/technology if you look at the root of the word you already see it's about 'systems and art/craft'

they are neither good nor bad. But we reached a point where our technologies enables us to do damage and good on such a large scale that it can be frightening.

so to me it's a multiplicator of abilities. It's an ethical dilemma. Not a technological one. Having a longer stick than your opponent already can be seen as a better technology. (as example in the korinthian wars the reform of Iphikrates).

That's my reasoning of technology.