Tag feed

#cicd

1,058 posts743 followers

Trending tags this week

Most Teams Don’t Have a DevSecOps Problem. They Have an Architecture Problem.

A lot of organizations think adopting DevSecOps means adding security scanners into CI/CD. That’s only surface-level automation. The deeper issue is that many delivery pipelines were never designed wi

Join discussion

YSYaroslav SnisarMay 5

9

Do you separate CI and CD in your architecture?

I’m trying to understand how different teams structure their delivery process. In many setups, CI handles everything (builds, deployments, approvals, sometimes even rollback logic). It works, but over

VJYVarsha and 8 more commented

SSarthak-code786May 3

0

Hi Everyone from past few weeks posing about my journey in Devops!

Will like to connect more people here in AI, Devops, basically tech. For new Ideas and opportunities, let's stay connected!

Join discussion

MAMohammad AdilMar 14

0

From Zero to Cloud: Setting Up a Full DevOps Pipeline with Terraform, Jenkins & Azure

A personal hands-on guide to building a GitHub + Jenkins + Terraform + Azure + Docker lab from scratch on Windows with VS Code — written for intermediate learners who want real practice, not just theo

Join discussion

APAlex PetrovFeb 26

0

GitHub Actions for simple deploys beats Jenkins every time

spent last 18 months maintaining a Jenkins setup for a rust CLI tool. 2GB of heap, yaml plugin soup, agents constantly dying. switched to GitHub Actions last quarter and haven't looked back. the diff

Join discussion

NONina OkaforFeb 25

0

Are we just accepting that GitHub Actions is vendor lock-in with extra steps?

I've spent the last month migrating off GHA to self-hosted runners and I'm genuinely confused why people treat it like the obvious choice. Yeah, the UX is polished but you're paying per-minute for bui

Join discussion

TLTom LindgrenFeb 25

1

Why are people still using GitHub Actions for anything CPU-intensive?

I've watched teams spin up Actions runners for data pipelines and batch jobs. The throughput is genuinely bad. You're paying GitHub's rates and getting queued behind everyone else's matrix builds. A s

JJake commented

JMJake MorrisonFeb 25

0

GitHub Actions matrix builds saved us from CI hell

We were hemorrhaging money on self-hosted runners for our mono-repo. 400+ test jobs per commit, running on beefy EC2 instances sitting idle most of the day. Switched to matrix strategy and cut costs b

Join discussion

PSPriya SharmaFeb 25

0

We burned 6 hours Friday night because our self-hosted runner got full disk and didn't report it

Our entire test suite started silently failing Docker builds. No alerts. GitHub Actions UI just showed red with some generic "runner offline" message. By the time we SSH'd in, /var was at 99% because

Join discussion

APAlex PetrovFeb 25

5

Parallel job dependencies saved us from rewriting our CI

Spent half a day debugging why our build was serializing everything when it could run in parallel. Turns out we were doing this: jobs: test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actio

NTNina and 4 more commented

#cicd

Search Hashnode

#cicd

Trending tags this week

Most Teams Don’t Have a DevSecOps Problem. They Have an Architecture Problem.

Do you separate CI and CD in your architecture?

Hi Everyone from past few weeks posing about my journey in Devops!

From Zero to Cloud: Setting Up a Full DevOps Pipeline with Terraform, Jenkins & Azure

GitHub Actions for simple deploys beats Jenkins every time

Are we just accepting that GitHub Actions is vendor lock-in with extra steps?

Why are people still using GitHub Actions for anything CPU-intensive?

GitHub Actions matrix builds saved us from CI hell

We burned 6 hours Friday night because our self-hosted runner got full disk and didn't report it

Parallel job dependencies saved us from rewriting our CI